AND THE NAZIS WERE CREATED AND FUNDED BY THE ROTHSCHILDS.
Talmudic Judaism: The Dark Truth@11. WAS HITLER A ROTHSCHILD?@by David Icke
Of course, the strength of feeling that fans the flames of condemnation against
anyone dubbed "anti-semitic" today is the sickening persecution of Jewish people
by the Nazis of Adolf Hitler. To expose or question the actions of the
Rothschilds or any other Jewish person or organisation is to be called a "nazi"
and "anti-semitic", that all-encompassing label which has discredited so many
researchers and stopped them having the opportunity to speak in public because
of protest by unthinking robot radicals and the refusal of venues to host their
meetings. I have had this from time to time, not least in eastern Canada thanks
to a campaign by B'nai B'rith and the Anti-Defamation League (which spends it's
entire time trying to defame people). Both organisations, I repeat, are
Rothschild created and controlled.
How strange then, that as I have documented in And The Truth Shall Set You Free
and The Biggest Secret, along with endless other researchers and scholars, Adolf
Hitler and the Nazis were created and funded by the Rothschilds. It was they who
arranged for Hitler to come to power through the Illuminati secret societies in
Germany like the Thule Society and the Vril Society which they created through
their German networks; it was the Rothschilds who funded Hitler through the Bank
of England and other British and American sources like the Rothschild's Kuhn,
Loeb, bank which also funded the Russian Revolution.
The very heart of Hitler's war machine was the chemical giant, I.G. Farben,
which had an American arm that was controlled by the Rothschilds through their
lackeys, the Warburgs. Paul Warburg, who manipulated into existence the
privately-owned "central bank" of America, the Federal Reserve, in 1913, was on
the board of American I.G. Indeed Hitler's I.G. Farben, which ran the slave
labour camp at Auchwitz, was, in reality, a division of Standard Oil, officially
owned by the Rockefellers, but in truth the Rockefeller empire was funded into
existence by the Rothschilds.
See And The Truth Shall Set You Free and The Biggest Secret for the detailed
background of this and other aspects of this story. The Rothschilds also owned
the German news agencies during both World Wars and thus controlled the flow of
"information" to Germans and the outside world. Incidentally, when Allied troops
entered Germany they found that the I.G. Farben factories, the very core of
Hitler's war operation, had not been hit by the mass bombing and neither had
Ford factories - another Illuminati supporter of Hitler. Other factories nearby
had been demolished by bombing raids.
51 Documents:@Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis by LENNI BRENNER
BUDDIES WERE JEW!!
Facing Our Fascist State
By Don Paul
– John D. Rockefeller, Jr., son of the
United Statesf first billionaire, father of David and Nelson Rockefeller,
speaking in a radio broadcast for the National War Fund on July 8, 1941, 5
months before g ePearl Harborf h and at the same time as the Rockefeller, Bush,
Dupont, Ford, Harriman, Hearst, Warburg, and other ruling-class families
continued to profit from Adolf Hitlerfs Nazi Germany.
– George Herbert
Walker Bush, 41st President of the United States, son of Prescott
Samuel Bush (an investment-banker whose Silesian-American Corporation profited
from slave-labor at Auschwitz during World War II and who later became a U. S.
Senator from Connecticut) on September 11, 1990.
CHASE MANHATTAN BANK'S RIGHT-WING RELATIONSHIP
by Robert Lederman
Daily News 12/7/98: Chase Banked On Nazis--Report "Chase National Bank--the
precursor of today's Chase Manhattan Bank--allegedly helped the Nazis plunder
Jewish property in France during World War II, according to a published report.
The New York-based bank, controlled by the Rockefeller family, closed Jewish
accounts even before the Germans ordered them to do so and did business with the
Nazis while they were sending Jews to the gas chambers, Newsweek magazine
reports in this week's edition. And while the US was at war with the Nazis,
Chase also apparently helped German banks do business with their overseas
branches, the magazine reported. Chase Manhattan is now the largest bank company
in the US with more than $300 billion in assets . . . lawyers representing
Holocaust survivors . . . intend to name Chase Manhattan to their lawsuit and
are investigating the wartime role of another big US bank, J.P. Morgan, the
magazine reported. While many other US businesses and banks closed down their
Paris operations after France fell to the Germans, Chase National remained open
and even thrived. The relationship between Chase and the Nazis apparently was so
cozy that Carlos Niedermann, the Chase branch chief in Paris, wrote his
supervisor in Manhattan that the bank enjoyed "very special esteem" with top
German officials and "a rapid expansion of deposits," according to Newsweek.
Niedermann's letter was written in May 1942-five months after the Japanese
bombed Pearl Harbor and the US also went to war with Germany."
Daily News 12/24/98: Chase Named In Holocaust-Asset Suit. Two American banks
were named in a class-action lawsuit yesterday that accuses them of
collaborating with the Nazis to deprive Jewish depositors of their rightful
assets. "They froze and blocked Jewish accounts during the period of the Nazi
occupation in France, depriving Jewish families of the financial means to flee
France," said attorney Kenneth McCallion, who filed the suit against Chase
Manhattan Bank, J.P. Morgan, and seven French banks. . . . McCallion charges
Chase's Paris branch-with full backing of its New York office--displayed
"excessive zeal" in enforcing anti-Jewish laws and was held in "very special
esteem" by Vichy authorities. Court papers also say Chase prospered under German
occupation, nearly doubling its deposits between 1942 and 1944 from 27 million
to more than 50 million French francs . . . Chase officials said in a statement
that it has been in settlement talks with the World Jewish Congress for several
weeks and that it was disappointed that an "unnecessary" lawsuit has been
WAS HITLER A ROTHSCHILD? by David Icke
Rockefeller financed "Cousin" Adolf
Hitler was a Rothschild
"There are some people who seriously doubt that Johann Georg Hiedler was the
father of Alois. Thyssen and Koehler, for example, claim that Chancellor
Dollfuss had ordered the Austrian police to conduct a thorough investigation
into the Hitler family. As a result of this investigation a secret document was
prepared that proved that Maria Anna Schicklgruber was living in Vienna at the
time she conceived. At that time she was employed as a servant in the home of
Baron Rothschild. As soon as the family discovered her pregnancy she was sent
back to her home in Spital where Alois was born. If it is true that one of the
Rothschilds is the real father of Alois Hitler, it would make Adolf a quarter
Jew. According to these sources, Adolf Hitler knew of the existence of this
document and the incriminating evidence it contained. In order to obtain it he
precipitated events in Austria and initiated the assassination of Dollfuss.
According to this story, he failed to obtain the document at that time since
Dollfuss had secreted it and had told Schuschnigg of its whereabouts so that in
the event of his death the independence of Austria would remain assured. Several
stories of this general
character are in circulation. (Langer, The Mind of Adolf Hitler,
p.107)." This fact alone explain why the
Hitler should come from
nowhere and become Chancellor of Germany.
EICHMANN WAS A JEW, FLUENT AT YIDDISH.
NAZI WAS A ZIONIST'S ORGAN TO CHASE JEWS OUT OF EUROPE TO ISRAEL.
June 11, 2001 NA (Network America)
More on the McVeigh / Oklahoma Cover-up
Eichmann spoke Yiddish, visited Palestine numerous times during the 1930s,
called himself a Zionist according to@several participants in that era, and was
instrumental in setting up training camps in various parts of Europe for the
Israeli commandos and gfreedom fightersh who would be used in the brutal
invasion and takeover of Palestine@in 1948. Hennecke Kardel, author of gAdolph
Hitler: Founder of Modern Israelh, himself said to be an Austrian Jew by at
least some authors, insists that Eichmann was himself Jewish.
BECAUSE OF HITLER, BIBICAL
PROPHECY IN AMOS WAS FULFILLED. WITHOUT HITLER, NATION OF ISRAEL NEVER EXISTS.
£The ruins of Israel would be rebuilt@Bible passage: Amos 9:11, 13
Prophet: Amos@Written: about 750 BC@Fulfilled: late 1900s
Amos 9:11, 13, the prophet said that God would restore the land of David. King
David ruled Israel from about 1010 BC to about 970 BC. During that time, Israel
was a united and sovereign nation. Afterwards, the land was divided into two
kingdoms and later conquered by a succession of world powers.
During the past two centuries, however, many Jews have returned from exile and
have rebuilt and reconditioned much of the land of Israel. The soil is again
productive, producing food exports for many countries. And the nation is again
sovereign and united.
WAS THERE REALLY A
By Dr. Edward.R. Fields
"Since the Second World War, Jews have been treated with silk gloves. Without
Auschwitz, there would be no Israel."
- by Nathan Goldmann, the Founder of Israel as quoted from Paris Match, December
The "Holocaust" has given Israel a tremendous psychological advantage over the
Gentile world, particularly America and Germany. By exploiting the guilt complex
instilled in non-Jews, they have obtained:
Over $65 billion in aid from Germany.
Over $55 billion in aid from America. Israel, a prosperous country, receives
$3.2 billion, (or $8 million a day) in foreign aid - more than any other
The 45,000 Jewish immigrants from Russia have the highest annual quota after
Mexico. They enter as "refugees" without having to prove persecution! As
"refugees" they are automatically entitled to full welfare benefits not subject
to welfare reform cuts.
Nonstop holocaust brainwashing in schools, TV, movies and books has placed
Israel and organized Jewry above criticism! How Many Jews Actually Died?
The World Almanac for 1947, in quoting figures supplies by the American Jewish
Committee states that the world Jewish population in 1939 was 15,688,259. The
New York Times of February 22, 1948, stated that the world Jewish population
ranged from 15,600,000 to 18,700,000, excluding some 600,000 to 700,000 living
in Palestine. How could the Jewish population have increased so rapidly after
losing six million during World War II? Walter Sanning, the author of
Dissolution of European Jewry, says that no less than 2,200,000 Jews had
emigrated out of Europe leaving 2,847,000 Jews residing there at the height of
the German occupation in June 1941. After the war, 3,375,000 Jews, according to
the Red Cross, applied for holocaust reparations. This figure included many of
the emigrants. Thus, the actual number of those who died at the camps from all
causes ranges between 150,000 and 300,000.
World Famous French Professor Says From All His Research Nazi Homicidal Gas
Chambers Did Not Exist
Dr. Robert Faurisson
Robert Faurisson is Europe's leading Holocaust revisionist scholar. He was
educated at the Paris Sorbonne, and served as associate professor at the
University of Lyon in France from 1974 until 1990. He is a recognized specialist
of text and document analysis. After years of private research and study, Dr.
Faurisson first made public his skeptical views about the Holocaust
extermination story in articles published in 1978 in the French daily Le Monde.
His writings on the Holocaust issue have appeared in two books and numerous
scholarly articles, many of which have been published in the IHR's Journal of
From Dust Jacket Piece (May 2004)
Dr. Robert Faurisson has concluded from his research that the alleged Hitlerite
gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same
historical lie, which has made possible a gigantic political-financial swindle
whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism and
whose main victims are the German people - but not their leaders - and the
Palestinian people in their entirety.
He has demonstrated that, for physical and chemical reasons, the alleged
Hitlerite gas chambers could not have existed. He has emphasised that the
Germans had wanted not to exterminate the Jews but to expel them from Europe
towards a Jewish national home elsewhere than in Palestine; that was what they
called "the final solution to the Jewish question" (die territoriale Endlösung
Many European Jews, civilians or soldiers, died as a result of wartime actions
and notably in the typhus epidemics, but many Jews survived and, in their
millions, dispersed throughout the world, going so far as to create and people a
new State, that of Israel.
Recently R. Faurisson has written that Adolf Hitler's weapons of mass
destruction (gas chambers and gas vans) existed no more at that time than do
those of Saddam Hussein today. The first lie received official endorsement in
November 1944 from an agency called the War Refugee Board, created by president
Roosevelt at the instigation of Henry Morgenthau, Junior. The second lie was
launched by another Washington agency, the Office of Special Plans, which
president Bush Junior created in 2002 at the instigation of Paul Wolfowitz. The
world is witness, at nearly sixty years' distance, to the same type of lie and
the same type of liars.
Born in 1929 of a French father and a Scottish mother, R. Faurisson holds the
agrégation des lettres (highest competitive examination) and a doctorate in
"literature and the social sciences". He was professor at the University of
Lyon-II where, in particular, he taught the "criticism of texts and documents
(literature, history, media)". Divested of his chair by an unexplained
ministerial ruling, he has suffered numerous physical assaults and incurred many
convictions in the French courts for disputing the myth of the "Holocaust". He
has published seven works: three of literary revisionism and four of historical
revisionism. His four volumes of Écrits révisionnistes (1974-1998) bring
together in more than two thousand pages articles, studies and critical
revisions of texts in which the upholders of an official history, increasingly
religious and repressive in character, are seen to yield step by step, on the
plane of reason, before the arguments and discoveries of historical revisionism
initiated, in France, by Paul Rassinier, author of Le Mensonge d'Ulysse (1950).
**** Foreword (May 2004)
The first edition of the present work dates from March 1999. I was indebted for
its production to Serge Thion and his lady friend, who had been willing to
compile, with a view to publication, articles and studies which, in addition to
some books or other revisionist writings, I had drafted between 1974 and 1998.
The present edition reproduces the contents of the first but not without
abundant corrections of detail. I owe this revised and corrected edition to Jean
Plantin and, especially, to Yvonne Schleiter. The index of names has been
reworked. In the absence of an index of subjects, there is a "reader's guide"
which I owe to Jean-Marie Boisdefeu. This second edition was supposed to appear
in 2001 but we have until now been constantly forced to postpone it. I had
promised in addition to these four volumes a volume of illustrations; I regret
not being able to keep that promise all the more as my work, essentially
concrete, would have benefited from the accompaniment of documents and
photographs of which, moreover, I possess a great number.
On 2 February of this year, I
devoted an article to my "Sombre Appraisal of Historical Revisionism". Since
that date, the situation has worsened. The conference that was to have
assembled more than two hundred sympathisers of the revisionist cause on the
24th and 25th of April in Sacramento, the capital of California, was cancelled
and, in Toronto, the worst is to be feared for Ernst Zündel, who has been kept
languishing for fifteen months in solitary confinement without charge. His
cruel detention has recently been endorsed by a superior court in its refusal
to issue a writ of habeas corpus.
Today, those active in revisionist
research or diffusion are very few. We may cite mainly Walter Mueller, Ingrid
Rimland, Germar Rudolf (helped by his friend Jürgen Graf in Russia), Michael
Santomauro and Bradley Smith in the United States, Heinz Koppe in Canada,
Fredrick Toben in Australia, Carlo Mattogno in Italy, Jean Plantin in France,
Vincent Reynouard in Belgium, Ahmed Rami and Serge Thion on the Internet.
On the scientific plane, revisionism
has achieved total victory. It no longer has a single adversary. The Hilbergs,
the Vidal-Naquets, the Klarsfelds, the Berenbaums, the Deborah Lipstadts and
one van Pelt, happy with repeating as his own the flimsy arguments of one
Jean-Claude Pressac, have been reduced to nothing. The revisionists find
themselves opposed only by Spielberg-style films, Yad Vashem ceremonies,
Disneyland-inspired museums, pilgrimages to Auschwitz, continuous media
ballyhoo, brainwashing at school and at university and, finally, a State
propaganda buttressed by legislative repression. Our foes have bowed to our
strength in the field but practically no one knows it, for the losers, what
with their power in the mass media and their virtuoso bluffing, go on blowing
their trumpets or shofars as if they had won the battle.
Their historians claimed that Hitler
had carried out a policy of extermination against the Jews, notably using
weapons of mass destruction called execution gas chambers or gas vans.
Besides, they assured us that, on the Eastern front, the Einsatzgruppen had
indulged in gigantic massacres of Jews. In sum, they would have us believe
that nearly the entire community of Jews in Europe had thus been exterminated.
Such a vast crime would have
presupposed an order from on high, a project, a plan, overall directives,
comprehensive instructions, financing, checks of operations and expenditures,
a multitude of specific or general assessments, research into and development
of weapons the like of which humanity had never known, along with the
involvement of large numbers of military men, scientists, engineers, labourers
and employees. An undertaking of the sort, especially if conducted in tightest
secrecy, would also have called for an array of draconian measures. The whole
project would have left numerous pieces of irrefutable evidence, both material
At first, the official historians
had the nerve to assert that such evidence indeed existed, and "in abundance".
But to the challenge to produce "one bit of proof, just one" of their
choosing, they beat a retreat and since then, following the example of J.-C.
Pressac, have invoked only the existence of "criminal traces" or "beginnings
of proof". Pursuing their withdrawal still further, they have invented an
account telling that the great massacre happened without an order, without a
directive, spontaneously (like "spontaneous generation", in a way). The most
prestigious of them, Raul Hilberg, falling back from his original affirmation
that there had been two orders from the Führer to kill the Jews, has been
reduced to maintaining that in fact it all came about without an order,
without a plan, and only thanks to "an incredible meeting of minds" within the
vast German bureaucracy, and by "a consensus mind-reading" amongst Nazi
No one has been able to find any
premises that might have been a genuine execution gas chamber. Nor a single
execution gas van. In respect to the greatest crime in the world the
accusation cannot provide any forensic study of the crime weapon. Amongst the
post-mortems there is not one that establishes gassing as the cause of death.
Those alleged witnesses to "gassings" who have been put under precise
cross-examination in public court proceedings have been unmasked. The
"execution gas chambers" shown to tourists have revealed themselves to be
Potemkin village contrivances. The massacres imputed to the Einsatzgruppen
have left behind no common burial sites approaching the mass graves of the
Katyn forest slaughter (4,255 corpses counted), an acknowledged crime whose
perpetrators were our very own Soviet allies.
On the other hand, there is no lack
of facts to prove that the 3rd Reich never had a policy of physical
extermination of the Jews. Even on the Eastern front, the killing of an
innocent Jewish civilian was punishable by heavy sanctions, including the
death penalty. Those soldiers who engaged in any form of excess with regard to
Jews were liable to sentence by a German court martial. There are countless
examples of measures taken, even in the camps, for the protection of the Jews
against the excesses inherent to all forms of detention, as well as against
the ravages caused by the epidemics.
The Germans had an obsessive fear of
disorder, of contagion, of the loss of manpower; even at Auschwitz there were
training centres for young Jews to learn various manual trades.
Millions of Jews survived the war,
in spite of the great carnage throughout Europe at the time, and in spite of
the apocalypse of a Germany pulverised by the Allied bombardments. Calling
themselves "survivors" or "miraculous escapees", many still today make up the
membership of organisations craving financial reparations. Now, fifty-nine
years after the war, the number of these "survivors" has recently been
estimated at 687,900 (the figure given by New York based demographer Jacob
Ukeles, cited in the article by Amiran Barkat "US Court to discuss question of
who is a Holocaust survivor", Haaretz, 18 April 2004).
During the war, Jewish leaders
uttered alarming words about an extermination of the Jews, but their conduct
showed that they did not really believe in it. The Allied governments saw that
they were dealing with "Jews trying to stoke us up". And then, the "brown
Jews" of the "international Jewish collaboration" were not wanting. Zionists
and National-Socialists shared, to a certain degree, a particular worldview;
hence, in 1941, the Stern Group's offer of military collaboration with Germany
against the British. As late as 21 April 1945 a member of the World Jewish
Congress, Norbert Masur, was received by Himmler to discuss the matter of Jews
to be delivered to the Allies.
The Germans sought to expel the Jews
from Europe, if possible with the accord of the rest of the world. They had in
mind a "territorial final solution of the Jewish question" ("eine territoriale
Endlösung der Judenfrage", as written in a foreign ministry memorandum of 21
August 1942 bearing the signature of an official called Martin Luther).
In France on 6 March 2004, during
Thierry Ardisson's television discussion programme "Tout le monde en parle"
("Everyone's talking about it"), admiral Philippe de Gaulle was heard to
state, regarding the Jews: "The Germans wanted, if not to exterminate them, at
least to get them out [of Europe]". That reflection, hardly lacking in
soundness, met only with silence in the media. Also h idden from the general
public is the fact that neither Churchill, nor Eden, nor Roosevelt, nor
Truman, nor Eisenhower, nor de Gaulle, nor Stalin ever cared to mention the
"gas chambers" or the "gas vans".
Those amongst them who, years after
the conflict had ended, wrote their wartime memoirs also persisted in keeping
quiet on the subject, as did Pius XII, although he was yet more hostile to
Hitler than to Stalin (see Robert Faurisson, Le Révisionnisme de Pie XII,
2003, 120 p.). Adolf Hitler's "weapons of mass destruction", his alleged
execution gas chambers and gas vans, existed no more than the "weapons of mass
destruction" of Saddam Hussein. In the two instances the lie and the liars
have been of identical origin: in 1944, under the aegis of Franklin Roosevelt,
the War Refugee Board spawned by Henry Morgenthau Jr and, in 2002, under the
aegis of George Bush Jr, the Office of Special Plans spawned by Paul Wolfowitz.
Unhappily, today, intoxicated by
holocaustic propaganda, people are not of a mind to call their beliefs into
question. The "Shoah" has become a religious superstition inspiring reverence
or fear. Conscious both of its own fragility and of the precarious standing of
the State of Israel, of which it is the sword and the shield, this religion
has erected daunting walls of defence, and harshly suppresses any who seek to
stand up to it. In the past, it took courage and sacrifices to be a truly
active revisionist; to remain one in future will require the heroism of
Antigone and an uncommon self-abnegation.
Professor F. Littell has said: "You
can't discuss the truth of the holocaust. That is a distortion of the concept
of free speech. The United States should emulate West Germany, which outlaws
-- Mind-boggling! Don't you think?
When necessary to contact richardkoshimizu:-